StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

A New Plan To Run You Over and Take Your Land

10/18/2021

4 Comments

 
Picture
I've spent the past week hopelessly wading through 165 different comments on FERC's proposed transmission rulemaking (at least the media says there are 165, I haven't counted them).  Average size of the filings are probably around 50 pages, but it seems like the "clean energy now" folks are trying just a bit too hard by submitting filings hundreds of pages long that include additional coma-inducing appendix reports (of course these "reports" are all paid for by special interest $$).

Some commenters agree with us, and some don't.  But some are just downright offensive.  That's where we're going to concentrate right now because there's a big ball of steam building that needs to be released before I take a deep breath and calmly wade back in.

It's the special interests that claim to speak for landowners.  Who the heck are these people and where do they get off claiming to speak for people they have never met, never spoken to, or interacted with in any way?

We'll start off light with what I'm going to call the "Big Green" comments.  These were signed by the typical environmental advocacy industry sycophants (yes, it's an industry since it supports itself with grants from corporations that will financially benefit from the ideas pushed forward.)  Just to name a few:  Sierra Club, NRDC, EarthJustice, Conservation Law Foundation,  and Acadia Center.  These self-serving blowhards commented:
"...we believe that the Commission’s Office of Public Participation is well positioned to play a leading role in ensuring that stakeholder concerns are heard early and are meaningfully addressed, and to develop principles and guidelines that strike an appropriate balance between addressing stakeholder concerns while also ensuring that transmission can be built at a speed and scope commensurate with the need to rapidly expand the transmission system and decarbonize the grid within the next 15 years, consistent with the United States’ goal of reaching 100 percent carbon-free electricity by 2035.
So, let's boil this down.  A landowner is to be "meaningfully addressed" but ultimately dismissed because she's standing in the way of the environmental utopia?  What the heck is "meaningfully addressed?"  It means absolutely nothing.  They also think that landowners would "benefit" from earlier interaction with the transmission developer.  Seems to me that the longer this power struggle goes on, the more the landowner hates the transmission developer.  What may initially be a mild and overly polite granny can turn into Nannie Doss (go ahead, look it up, I'll wait) if you give it enough time.  Don't mess with old ladies... they're generally all out of shits to give.  Trust me on this.

Who are Big Green to tell FERC how we shall be "addressed"?  Moreover what makes them think this will be successful?  It won't.  Big Green doesn't know crap about opposition to transmission.  In fact, they've recently been showing up in state permitting proceedings as cheerleaders for more transmission.  Would any landowner in his right mind let The Sierra Club represent his interests in a transmission line siting case?

Think you're mad now?  Think again, because the Niskanen Center puts the Big Green blowhards to shame.  If you're a regular blog reader, you won't be surprised in the least to find out that Niskanen is pretending that it represents landowners affected by new transmission.  Niskanen has had ZERO interaction with any transmission opposition groups.  That's probably because, like Big Green, they are cheerleading for more transmission.  Also stuff like this:
In doing so, expanding the total land area required for electric generation (apart from transmission) by a factor of 13, with wind and solar taking up 590,000 square kilometers, an area roughly equal to the size of Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Ohio, Rhode Island, and Tennessee put together.
That's right... if Niskanen was in charge (and maybe they are if they make the right political moves) Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Connecticut, Kentucky, Tennessee Taxachusetts and another minor state would be filled end to end, border to border, with wind and solar installations (and little else).  This is not workable, financially or otherwise.

But not knowing squat about transmission opposition doesn't stop Niskanen from being an expert at it.  Why, Niskanen devoted a whole half-day to a workshop discussing ways to build an equally astounding amount of new transmission in the shortest time possible.  Wow!  A whole half-day?  I've been doing this for 13 years now, and I still haven't learned everything, but I have learned a damn site more than Niskanen.  Niskanen's plan is completely pointless when it comes to landowners and will do nothing but create more layers of delay.  But don't let that stop them...

Here's one particularly annoying passage from their "report."
Community attitudes are shaped by perceptions of project impacts on land, culture, landscape, aesthetics, and wildlife; noise, health, and safety; and economic factors such as landowner compensation, employment, tax revenues, and property values.
What's missing from this urban-focused list?  Impacts and obstacles to farming, which is likely the biggest factor for rural landowners who use their land to make a living.  But, what can you expect from a band of burghers who probably think vegetables are manufactured in factories?

Here's another:
For some new projects, communities ask for financial assistance for a new fire station or library or park.
Not once in 13 years has any group I've worked with asked for any of these things.  Who are these communities?  And, even if they did, giving a library to a town in exchange for privately-held land owned by someone who lives nearby is not compensation.  The town doesn't own the land being sacrificed.  It has no skin in the game.  If you don't believe me, there's this bridge in Brooklyn that I will sell to you for $10...

There's more... lots more... infuriating comments that could only be made by someone with their head shoved so far up their own keister that the oxygen levels are getting low.

What else could explain how their prattle about Clean Line Energy Partners is in need of a serious fact check?  For example:
The Clean Line proposals traversed multiple states with some new rights-of-way
Some?  Try ALL, sweetcheeks.  ALL of Clean Line's rights of way were new.  That's one of the reasons opposition was so emphatic and widespread, but not the primary one.  Two words:  Eminent Domain.

How about this?
CleanLine Energy Partners participated in a public-private partnership with the U.S. DOE that provided financial support and federal siting authority through a provision in Section 1222 of the EPAct of 2005.  This partnership was revoked when the administration changed in 2016. Though this dissolution followed a series of setbacks for the project, the political risks of executive branch solutions are salient.

Financial support?  No.  The government wasn't giving Clean Line a dime.  It worked the other way... Clean Line was giving the DOE money for its "participation."  The partnership was REVOKED not because of the changing administration, but because CLEAN LINE COULDN'T FIND ANY CUSTOMERS and the partnership agreement required Clean Line to have sufficient customers to pay for the project before it could move forward.  Clean Line collapsed because it could not find any customers.  End of story.  Niskanen got the whole DOE thing wrong because it was not involved and has not talked to any landowners who were.

Which bring us to the conclusion... Niskanen does not speak for landowners affected by new transmission, and never will.  Shut up, and sit down, you bombastic blowhards.

Okay, I feel better now.  I'm going back in... if you don't hear from me for a while, toss me a rope.  I may have gotten lost in there.
4 Comments

Consumer Organizations File Comments on FERC's Rulemaking to Reform Transmission Planning

10/12/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
It's been a pleasure to work with a bunch of different consumer groups to craft comments on FERC's advanced notice of proposed rulemaking to reform transmission planning, cost allocation and generator interconnection.

Our group comments were docketed today.

Wait... do I see your eyes rolling back into your head?  Stop... don't go away.  Perhaps you'll enjoy reading them almost as much as I enjoyed writing them.

No complicated, technical stuff this time, I promise.  Just a little common sense speaking truth to power.  Isn't that something we all need to do more of lately?
0 Comments

FERC's New Nightmare

10/10/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
S&P Global tells us that some transmission owners and former energy regulators aren't exactly gung-ho over the congressional infrastructure thing.  Two things stick in their craw... federal siting and permitting and taxpayer-funded anchor tenant contracts.

Strike up the band... it's not every day I agree with some transmission owners and former energy regulators!

On the possibility that FERC could take over siting and permitting of new transmission

"I think members of Congress are overestimating the federal government's ability to approve transmission lines in a speedy manner while underestimating the controversy this will foment amongst constituents," said Tony Clark, a Republican former FERC chair.
Oh yes, I've been fomenting since I was knee-high to  grasshopper and have big plans for my fomenting future.

Clark continued:
But strengthening FERC's hand in permitting may not resolve those issues and could even create new ones, former FERC member Clark said. Intervenors will still be able to challenge new projects at the federal level, according to Clark. And allowing FERC to override states' decisions not to condemn private property in support of a transmission developer's plans could put the agency "in a difficult position."

"It looks to me like a nightmare scenario for FERC," Clark said.
And so it shall be.  If FERC thinks it's finally gotten a handle on the gas pipeline protestors that have been disturbing their processes and haunting their headquarters for years, they've got another think coming.

And why would FERC want to attract this kind of attention when it could, instead, make transmission better and less likely to be opposed?  You catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar, FERC.  More on this coming soon....

On the issue of taxpayer-funded anchor tenants:
Some market participants have also expressed concern with the anchor tenant program. Transmission developer ITC Holdings Corp. said the Senate improved the proposal by specifying that projects funded through the program should not conflict with projects emerging through the regional transmission organization stakeholder process. But the bill still risks subsidizing uneconomic projects, while overall program funding of $2.5 billion "is small," ITC's vice president of federal and regulatory affairs Nina Plaushin said.
That's right... regulated companies that build regionally planned transmission projects are protecting their golden goose from unregulated, unplanned merchant transmission that would be the sole beneficiary of the completely misguided anchor tenant proposal.  In brief, this proposal would make the federal government purchase transmission capacity from a merchant project that doesn't have enough customers to become viable.  Of course, the government wouldn't USE the capacity, but the merchant transmission developer would USE the cash provided by the anchor tenant contract to finance its project.  But fake government customers do NOT make a merchant transmission project needed.  Merchant transmission is a market-based concept where transmission is built in response to a market need.  If there is no market for a particular merchant transmission project, then it should not be built.  These roads to nowhere should not be artificially propped up using taxpayer funds.  The whole idea is idiotic.

This entire article demonstrates that perhaps the "clean energy" crowd has proposed too many conflicting "good things" to encourage more electric transmission construction and that all these different goodie bags banging together are creating so much friction, it's going to blow the whole idea of new transmission off the map. 

They don't realize that they're killing their golden goose.
0 Comments

Red Alert on the Hypocrisy Level

10/10/2021

0 Comments

 
What's happened to our society when a political group can actually say this to Congress with a straight face?
Niskanen appreciates this opportunity to bring to the Committee’s attention some specific concerns regarding two issues: (1) how poorly landowners are treated under the Natural Gas Act when pipelines seek to take their property for interstate natural gas pipelines, and (2) the need for Congress to create federal electric transmission siting authority.
So, since landowners have been treated badly by the feds under the Natural Gas Act, let's expand federal control of electric transmission line siting so that even more landowners can be treated badly by the federal government?  Do they even know how hypocritical they sound?

This is what happens when your "concern" for landowners is really, deep down, just concern for your own environmental and political goals.  It's not about the landowners... it never was.  Groups like Niskanen use landowners like a battering ram to get their own way because they don't have any compelling supporters of their own.  Landowners are mere pawns in a political game, but yet they allow it because they need the money and political power wielded by these hypocritical institutions to win their own, personal battle.  So while gas pipeline opponents allow Niskanen to "represent" them, electric transmission opponents do not.  Niskanen wants to toss these folks under the bus.  Therefore, who is Niskanen to ask Congress to make electric transmission siting a federal affair?  They need to butt out and shut up.  This is not their battle.

Considering how they have not interacted with any electric transmission opposition group, it takes a lot of chutzpah for Niskanen to tell Congress that new legislation will "protect" landowners.  Niskanen has NO IDEA what issues are important to landowners in electric transmission battles.  Go ahead, read about all the "protections" Niskanen thinks are beneficial to you.  For the most part, they are nothing more than the protections currently available under state law, and we all know how little those do to actually protect landowners.  It's just another slate of "landowner protections" that are created by the folks who seek to take advantage of landowners.  No landowners were consulted in their creation.  It's self-serving dreck about as useful to landowners as a screen door on a submarine.

Oh, but wait... these folks have come up with a new "protection" that actually puts landowners at greater risk.  See Section (j) Other Landowner Rights and Protections on page 27.  Here an energy company is required to return property taken using eminent domain if the project is not in operation by the date on its certificate.  Of course, an energy company need only apply for an extension if it fails to meet the drop dead date, so this provision is unlikely to ever be used.  But, say it does come into play...  In order to have his property returned, a landowner must REPAY the energy company up to 50% of the amount he received in the taking.  That's right... those "compensation" payments cannot be used by the landowner to compensate for the damage done until AFTER a project is completed, less the landowner is given the option to purchase his property back before the project is completed.  Where would a landowner get the money to buy his own property back if not from the original award?  This also overlooks the fact that any part of the compensation described as "damages" is most likely taxable.  The landowner would have to give a great big chunk of his award to the government up front, then bank the rest as insurance in case the project gets abandoned and he wants to buy his property back.  In every instance of an abandoned electric transmission project, the transmission owner has been required to return the easement to the property owner at no cost.  Why should this be changed to put landowners at a disadvantage?  Landowner protections?  Hardly!  This is what happens when the energy project owner writes "protective" legislation for landowners.

Niskanen Center does not represent landowners in electric transmission siting situations.  It does not represent us.  Their shameless audacity in pretending to do so is repugnant.
0 Comments

Misdelivered Mail From The Great Beyond

10/9/2021

0 Comments

 
The GBE propaganda from Invenergy is getting pretty thick on the ground.  One landowner received this mailer yesterday, along with a 60-day notice to sign an easement or else eminent domain may be used.
Picture
Does Invenergy really think this landowner is going to visit their little website to share why they support having their property taken by eminent domain in order to make way for a speculative transmission project that has no customers?  I continue to ask... what's the point of wasting millions of dollars on garbage mailers, radio & TV ads?  The whole thing is whack and can only work in the mind of Invenergy's PR hucksters.  Sort of like "Positive Energy."  Did the same team that was responsible for that PR disaster think up this one?  Looks like it to me.

Invenergy even has the wrong address for this landowner in its files and keeps trying to send notices to an address that hasn't been used for more than a decade.  Speaking of wrong addresses, a couple of responses to GBE's advertising binge that asks recipients to visit a website to share why they support GBE seem to have been delivered to the wrong place.  Perhaps their delivery got scrambled on the way from the great beyond?  I think I'll forward them to GBE via this blog, since GBE is one of my biggest fans.
Dear GBE, 

Here’s the thing… I don’t support you. I think you are an opportunistic thief without a moral compass. I would never treat people that way. Don’t compare yourself to me. I made millions smile, but you have made millions cry. Your hundreds of threats of eminent domain to take private property has turned Missouri into The Unhappiest Place on Earth.

Never yours,
Walt Disney
Rolling in my Grave

Hello Folks!

When it comes to disaster for Missouri, we've got a lot in common!  I may have turned a whole town into an environmental disaster, but you da man, turning an entire STATE into an environmental disaster! 

I support Grain Belt Express because of its potential for both environmental and financial disaster for Missouri.  We disasters gotta stick together!

At first, everyone thought I was harmless, but when I got sprayed all  over the place to control dust, it soon became apparent that I was a bad idea, much like you.

Times Beach would be a great place to build GBE.  The landowners there no longer mind.

Love,
Dioxin Contaminated Motor Oil
Former Superfund Site

Dear Grain Belt Express,

I was once quoted as saying, "Our job is only to hold up the mirror - to tell and show the public what has happened." 

When the mirror is held to GBE, I'm afraid it looks like a speculative energy project without enough customers that is having way too much fun playing with its new eminent domain toy unwisely gifted by a misguided, and perhaps biased, politically-poisoned institution.

Last time I checked you didn't have enough commercial interest to make your transmission project economically viable.  But yet you seem to be in a big, big hurry to take land for a project you can't build.  Is there something else going on here?

Please stop using my name in your insultingly facile advertising.  As the former "most trusted man in America", I do not support you.

And that's the way it is,
Walter Cronkite
Reporting from the Great Beyond

Rumble, tumble, Invenergy!  You shake things up more than I do, and not in a good way.  That's why I support the Grain Belt Express!

Sincerely yours,
New Madrid Earthquake
Soon to be Born Again if They Keep Pumping Things Deep Underground

To Whom It May Concern,

On the off chance that your misguided advertising campaign actually produces more than a handful of self-interested "supporters," I advise that whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.  But I don't think you'll get much of a response from the Missouri people.  They know manure when they smell it.

I propose a grand deal... if you don't find any new supporters, then you abandon the Grain Belt Express.  What do you say?


In the first place God made idiots. This was for practice. Then he made public relations hacks.

The more I learn about people, the more I like my dog,
Samuel Clemens (my REAL name)


Sirs:

A competent leader can get efficient service from poor troops, while on the contrary an incapable leader can demoralize the best of troops.

You have demoralized the people of Missouri with your selfish, greedy scheme.

General John J. Pershing
No Longer At War In The Afterlife

Lovely, Contentious, Disastrous GBE,

We support you and look forward to adding you to our repertoire.

All the best,
Fire, Disease, Flood, Bad Weather and Pestilence, Inc.

Dear Invenergy,

Stop it!  You're making things tough on us.  We need the cropland you're taking out of production to stage our own disasters.

Not a fan,
Plague of Locusts

Hey Hucksters,

You don't really think people are going to go out of their way to support massive eminent domain takings across Missouri so that you can build a power line without any clear benefits for Missouri, do you?  Your "Way of the American Genius" campaign is a ship without a rudder.

What are you going to do with your manufactured support?  Push it under the noses of Missouri utilities and hope they see the light and sign up to become your customer?  Don't you know that utilities want to build and own infrastructure of their own because it's highly profitable?  Should Missouri close its own electric generators that employ thousands in good-paying jobs and replace them with energy imported from other places?

Or is this campaign just cover so you can make up "supporters" and then try to leverage your kingdom of make-believe for political purposes?

Failure looks good on you,
John Q. Public
Scanning a QR Code Because I Have Nothing Better To Do
0 Comments

PJM Suspends Transource Independence Energy Connection Project

10/7/2021

0 Comments

 
A couple weeks ago, PJM's Board of Managers very quietly suspended the Transource Independence Energy Connection Project "due to permitting risks."*

Between court, writing regulatory filings, and *gasp* a long-delayed vacation, I totally missed it.  From the look of things, though, so did everyone else.  So it's time to stand up and cheer, everyone!  You did it!!!

What does "suspend" mean?  It means that the project, which PJM calls "9A", has been removed from PJM's Regional Transmission Expansion Plan "pending further notice."  The project is not outright cancelled in its entirety... yet.  But, this means we're half-way there!!!
PJM says it will remove 9A from its upcoming RTEP and re-evaluate any reliability issues that remain.
Picture
And what reliability issues does PJM foresee in its unneeded project crystal ball?  These. 
Picture
But, pay attention to that last sentence in the very small font.  "Note: Violations are small in magnitude and operating steps for a short term duration can mitigate issues pending further review in 2022 RTEP."

Violations are small and not causing any problems currently.  You probably don't need a $500M sledgehammer to crack these nuts.

However, this whole thing bears watching.  I hate to tell you this, but when the same thing happened with the PATH Project, we had to wait 18 months for the re-evaluation and the actual cancellation of the project.  But I fully expect it is coming.

Now maybe Transource can quit wasting my money?
*This means YOU!  Good work!
0 Comments

Kleptomania

10/6/2021

0 Comments

 
Grain Belt Express has finally filed a condemnation case in Missouri.  It wants to
...condemn land and interests therein for any public use or purpose, and to acquire perpetual easements in, over, and across lands in which defendants have an interest, together with rights of ingress and egress to said lands.
Here's the gory details
The property interests and easement rights which Plaintiff seeks to condemn and are necessary for the Project include and are described as follows:
rights to develop, permit, construct, reconstruct, repair, improve, alter, replace,
operate, use, inspect, maintain and remove a transmission line, which transmission
line may include poles, towers and structures, such wires and cables as Grain Belt
shall from time to time suspend therefrom, foundations, footings, attachments,
anchors, ground connections, communications devices, and other equipment,
accessories, access roads and appurtenances, as Grain Belt may deem necessary or
desirable in connection therewith and to study or inspect in preparation therefor,
including survey, soil sampling, geotechnical evaluation, environmental tests,
archeological assessments, and transmission and interconnection studies. The
permanent rigbt-of-way may be used for the transmission of electrical energy and
for communication purposes, whether existing now or in the future in order to
facilitate the delivery of electrical energy. The easement rights include the nonexclusive
right of ingress and egress over the Easement Property itself in order to obtain access to the permanent right-of-way,
and over the Defendant's property adjacent to the Easement Property and lying
between public or private roads. Grain Belt shall, without being liable for damages,
have the right from time to time, including after the initial construction of the
transmission line, to clear the Easement Property of any improvements or other
structures to the extent that they interfere with Grain Belt's use of the Easement
Property as described herein, except fences (provided Grain Belt shall at all times
have access through any such fence by means of a gate); control, cut down, trim
and remove trees and underbrush from the Easement Property; and cut down and
trim any tree encroaching upon the Easement Property or the transmission line that
in the reasonable opinion of Grain Belt may interfere with the safety, proper
operation and/or maintenance of the transmission line.
What for?
...to construct and maintain a high voltage, direct current transmission line and associated facilities commonly referred to as the Grain Belt Express Project.
Yeah, well, I'm betting it has a more common name, but I don't use such language here.

But GBE says this won't be burdensome to the landowner

The use of the foregoing Property Interests, including any expansion of its facilities within the Easement Property by Plaintiff, upon condemnation thereof, does not impose an
unreasonable burden or impact on Defendants' property or Defendants' activities thereon, and
Defendants shall retain the right to use the Easement Property in any manner not inconsistent with the rights of Plaintiff described herein, including use of the Easement Property for agricultural or other similar purposes.
So, what happens next?  The Court
Appoint[s] three disinterested residents of Buchanan County, Missouri as the Commissioners to ascertain and assess the damages, if any, that the Defendants may sustain and the just compensation, if any, to which they may be entitled by reason of the appropriation of the Easement Property and
Property Interests;
Picture
It could get expensive.

But why now?  GBE says it needs to take this property NOW to construct a merchant transmission line that only has one known customer.  If GBE does not have enough customers to create a revenue stream adequate to pay its costs to build and operate, then the project will not be built.

Why would any court authorize a taking for a speculative project?  If GBE doesn't find enough customers, the line won't be built and it will have acquired property that is NEVER put into public use.  This may keep lawyers in Missouri busy for years to come...

Is this what the Missouri Public Service Commission envisioned?

What if you build it and they don't come?
0 Comments

Hubris is a Renewable Resource

10/6/2021

0 Comments

 
...a wise man once said.

I guess Invenergy is expanding its renewable resource portfolio then.  What else explains this:
Picture
Yes, right there in North Missouri the locals are going to erect a new Mt. Rushmore to their homegrown heroes.  Mark Twain, J.C. Penney, Walt Disney... and... Michael Polsky?  Don't hold your breath, Mikey, old boy.

First off, these three are from Missouri, born and bred.  Michael Polsky is not.  Invenergy isn't even a company based in Missouri.  Its headquarters are in Chicago.

What the heck, Invenergy... "our legacy"?  Invenergy has no legacy in Missouri, aside from the absolute misery it has put thousands of landowners through over the past decade trying to build a merchant transmission project that doesn't have enough customers to be viable.

Invenergy has no "legacy" as a genius, American or otherwise.  It's a company.  It's not human.  It has no brain of its own.  The real heroes that Invenergy used in its latest round of shameless propaganda were actual real people who did things to entertain or sustain people.  They didn't take private property from Missourians to fill their own pockets.

Does the crackpot PR team at Invenergy headquarters really think this kind of trash is going to impress "the locals"?  It's more likely to just... well... piss them off.

Besi menya.

Invenergy has been busier than a well-funded political candidate mailing out the oversized glossy card stock ads that fill everyone's mailbox in the run up to election day.  Ya know what happens to all that stuff?  Right in the trash can.  Nobody reads it.

But what if they did?  Would some random person who got one of these glossy ads in their mailbox really take the time to go to a website and tell them why they support something they know nothing about?  Not.  Happening.

Ya know... I'm going to take a guess here that the only people who sign up may be the dead and gone Mark (who had a real name that all Missourians know), J.C. and Walt.  In fact, it wouldn't surprise me if they signed up many, many times over the coming weeks and told Invenergy just why it is that they support the taking of private property for corporate profit.

Invenergy missed the boat though... Maya Angelou might have been a better choice of native Missourian.  They could have even quoted her...
I've learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.
Invenergy makes Missourians feel pissed off.
0 Comments

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.