StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

New York Jumps on Economic Potential of Offshore Wind

1/12/2017

0 Comments

 
New York's governor recently announced a commitment to 2400 MW of offshore wind.  And people got excited.
“Governor Cuomo’s bold commitment to harvest New York’s abundant offshore wind power could make us a regional hub for offshore wind development, creating jobs and attracting significant industry investments, while allowing the state to reach its 50 percent renewable energy mandate,” Gordian Raacke, Executive Director of Renewable Energy Long Island said.
That's right... by tapping the huge renewable resource right outside their own front door, the citizens of New York not only get cleaner power, they also get the jobs and economic development that come along with new industry.  The more they build, the cheaper offshore wind becomes, and best of all, nobody has to sacrifice their land and way of life to support the energy needs of someone else.  New York can spend its energy dollars in its own community.

And just in case some billionaires get their panties in a wad about the offshore turbines spoiling their sea views, Governor Cuomo assured New Yorkers:
They will not be visible from the beach. They will be 30 miles southeast of Montauk. Not even Superman standing on Montauk Point could see these wind farms.
Superman?  I think he meant super rich man.  While it's reassuring that New York's offshore wind isn't going to intrude on anyone's property rights, this begs the question of why any property rights anywhere should be compromised in the name of cleaner energy?  Midwest wind shipped to the east coast via gigantic and expensive new transmission lines was last decade's idea.  Get over it.  Move on.  Offshore wind and a booming new coastal industry is the future.

It's good news that New York has created a win-win for its citizens by taking responsibility for its own energy needs.  Bravo!  Now maybe our heartland can get back to the important business of feeding America, instead of being continually hounded to make huge sacrifices to their heritage, profit and productivity in order to charge America's iPhone.

First it was Rhode Island, now New York.  And Massachusetts has also made a commitment to offshore wind.  Who else wants to get into the game?
0 Comments

Clean Line Deathwatch Victim #2:   Southwire

1/8/2017

7 Comments

 
Clean Line "preferred vendor" Southwire joined compatriot General Cable in the cemetery of good intentions this week.
Picture
Southwire announced that it will be closing its Flora, Illinois facility in the first quarter of this year.  That's a lot of permanent jobs that will disappear from southern Illinois.  And another of Clean Line's "strategic alliances" bites the dust.

Rock Island Clean Line's "strategic alliance" with Southwire:
Clean Line recently announced an agreement with Southwire, designating Southwire as the preferred supplier of the overhead transmission wire for the Rock Island Clean Line. The agreement anticipates that the wire will be produced in Southwire’s facility in Flora, Illinois, where the company employs approximately 130 people. Clean Line and Southwire announced the agreement on March 6, 2012, at the American Wind Energy Association’s Regional Wind Energy Summit- Midwest.
Grain Belt Express Clean Line's "strategic alliance" with Southwire:
A leader in technology and innovation, Southwire Company, LLC is one of North America’s largest wire and cable producers. Southwire and its subsidiaries manufacture underground and overhead Utility products, Renewable Energy products, building wire and cable, metal-clad (MC) cable, portable and electronic cord products. Southwire also provides OEM wire products, engineered products, continuous casting technology, and products made by Technology Research, LLC and Watteredge, LLC, both subsidiaries of Southwire Company.

Southwire’s Flora, Illinois plant has more than 40 years of experience in the design and manufacturing of overhead transmission conductor. Today, the plant leverages that expertise to support large-scale transmission projects like Grain Belt Express. The Grain Belt Express project could require as much as $35 million in materials from Southwire, depending on commodity prices and other variables.
So what happens to Southwire's extra-special MOU with Clean Line to purchase transmission wire for two of its proposed projects valued at more than $100M?  Will Southwire manufacture the wire for Clean Line in another state or even another country?  How exactly does this help the state of Illinois?  And how much did the Illinois Commerce Commission depend on an increase in Illinois jobs when it approved the Rock Island and Grain Belt projects?
SPRINGFIELD (Nov. 12, 2015) – The Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) today approved an Order granting Clean Line Energy a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to construct and operate the Illinois portion of the 780-mile direct current Grain Belt Express Clean Line.

The project will bring approximately $700 million of private investment to the state of Illinois, create about 1,500 jobs and support Illinois manufacturing.

Clean Line is also committed to supporting local businesses and has designated Southwire Company a preferred supplier for wire for the transmission line. Southwire will manufacture the wire at its plant in Flora, Illinois.

Whoopsie!  And what about all the economic promises to Illinois touted by the Chamber of Commerce?
“The Illinois Chamber of Commerce applauds Clean Line Energy and Southwire Company for coming together to support manufacturing jobs in Illinois,” said Todd Maisch, President and CEO of the Illinois Chamber of Commerce. “Through this agreement, the Grain Belt Express Clean Line will create vital work orders for a local company. Clean Line’s commitment to hiring locally whenever possible will ensure that the Grain Belt Express will be an economic boon to the state.”
Gone with the wind.

So, let's review.  One of three Plains & Eastern Clean Line "strategic alliances" is kaput.  One of three Rock Island Clean Line "strategic alliances" is kaput.  One out of five "strategic alliances" for the Grain Belt Express Clean Line is kaput.

A MOU with a company that can't get its projects approved, financed and built can't prevent economic disaster.

Who's next?
7 Comments

Clean Line Sponsors Hen House for Utility Chickens

1/7/2017

2 Comments

 
Here chickie, chickie, chick...

Clean Line Energy Partners and the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy are "sponsoring" a "clean power summit" for southeastern states.  What a great way to herd all the southern utility chickens into the HVDC merchant transmission line hen house!

Still completely desperate for customers I see, Clean Line.  As if listening to Mario Harturdo for 45 minutes is going to result in enough transmission capacity contracts to save your project?  That's pretty pathetic.  And also amusing.
Picture
Nobody wants to contract for transmission capacity on an unbuilt transmission line that doesn't connect with any existing generators.  No generators, no transmission line, no customers!

While the vast majority of the presentations at the "summit" are about distributed generation, solar and building wind generators in the southeast, never fear, Clean Line and its environmental puppet will be making presentations touting the wonderfulness of long-distance HVDC transmission from the Midwest.  Sounds like a good time to step outside and get a cup of coffee, return some phone calls.

Here's what's timely and interesting for southeastern utilities:
  • South Carolina’s Distributed Energy Resource Act
  • Southeast Solar, Renewable Energy Policy and Rate Design Update
  • Entergy New Orleans’ Self-Build Aggregated Rooftop Solar Project
  • Management of Purchase Agreements for Both Power and RECs
  • State Utility Commissioners’ Perspectives on Clean Power in the Southeast (renewable resources policies and development in the region)
  • Distributed Solar at Florida Power & Light
  • Case Study: Designing a Community Solar + Storage Project to Meet Customer Needs
  • Community Solar: Where Are We Now?
  • Ratemaking Challenges and Solutions with Renewable Energy
  • New Hydropower at Existing Dams, Realizing the Full Potential of Existing Infrastructure
  • Net Energy Metering Across Entergy’s Jurisdictions
  • Renewable Energy Programs in the Tennessee Valley
All these topics focus on southeastern renewable resources... making the most of what's available locally.  And then there's Clean Line, and SACE, sticking out like a couple of sore thumbs.
  • Utilizing HVDC Transmission to Enhance Renewable Energy Delivery in the Southeast
    High-voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission is the most efficient technology to move large amounts of power over long distances. Utilizing HVDC, the Plains & Eastern Clean Line will provide southeastern states with access to some of the best wind energy resources in the country. Low-cost wind power delivered by this project is an essential measure to help southeastern states diversify their energy mix. This presentation will outline the measures by which Clean Line is conveying low-cost renewable energy from windy areas in the Plains States to areas with a demand for clean energy. It will also examine how Clean Line has navigated state and federal permitting processes to advance the project to construction.
Say what?  Construction?  Clean Line hasn't put one shovel anywhere near the ground yet.  And why is that?  Because Clean Line has no customers!  No customers, no eminent domain help from the U.S. DOE, and no project financing.  And, just so you know, Clean Line isn't an "essential measure" for any purpose.  Transmission lines that are "essential" would be supported by regional planning authorities.  Clean Line is not supported by any planning authority.  Clean Line is pure "build it and they will come" speculation.  Except Clean Line wants the chickens to come before they build it, and that's just not happening.

So, if the chickens aren't convinced by Mario Harturdo's presentation, there's still an opportunity to be guided to buy transmission capacity on an unbuilt transmission line to nowhere by the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.
  • Key Considerations for Southern Wind Power    Wind power opportunities for customers in the south are expanding. North Carolina has installed its first utility-scale wind farm, highlighting the improvement of new turbine technology for in-region wind power. Utilities are beginning to focus on winter peak demand requirements, during times when power resources would provide substantial capacity. The changes in the federal production tax credit (PTC) for wind power effectively gives a four-year window, after signing a power purchase agreement, to receive power. Major proposed high voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission projects would connect exceptionally high value, low cost wind power resources to the southeast. How do these key considerations affect plans for renewable energy purchases in the next five years? What are the primary benefits, and challenges, to incorporating more wind power into the southeastern electricity mix? This segment will focus on recent changes and considerations for southern wind power and how to evaluate what opportunities exist.
Oh for the love of Woodsy Owl... the last thing a bunch of utility executives need is to be "taught" how to evaluate wind power purchases by an environmentalist.  SACE knows so much about utility renewable purchase agreements that it recently sponsored a petition asking the TVA to buy power from Clean Line Energy.  (Hint:  Clean Line does not sell power.  It is a wanna be transmission company.)  I hope Simon is planning to play loud music during his presentation to cover up all the laughter from the audience.

And for attending this glorified sales pitch, conference organizer EUCI wants you to pay $1195 in conference fees, per person, plus the cost of travel, room & board while you're whooping it up for 2 days in beautiful, warm Charleston, SC.

Sorta makes you wonder... if these "summits" have "sponsors" that are permitted to advertise their products with presentations during the "summit," why is there an additional fee to attend?  Is EUCI splitting the loot with its "sponsors?"

Heeeerrrre chickie, chick, chick...
2 Comments

Clean Line Helping Communities... One Extended Stay Hotel Chain at a Time

12/31/2016

8 Comments

 
Clean Line Energy Partners has been busy joining Chambers of Commerce in Arkansas towns outside its Plains & Eastern Clean Line project's route.

I guess the idea is that Clean Line is going to help Hot Springs, Conway, and North Little Rock develop economically by providing opportunities for these communities to profit from the project.  And here's proof!

Clean Line Energy Partners has opened an office in Arkansas!

Here's a picture of it.
Picture
That's right, Clean Line's new membership in the North Little Rock Chamber of Commerce lists its business address as 400 River Market Ave. #406, Little Rock, AR 72201.

That's Room #406 at the Homewood Suites Extended Stay Hotel in downtown Little Rock.  Sounds totally legit to me!  The only thing more legit would be a rented mailbox at one of those mail drop places.

Why should Clean Line rent a real brick and mortar office space in Arkansas when they can operate their "business" out of an extended stay hotel?  It's not like they're going to be around long enough to need permanent housing or a permanent office.   And Clean Line's rental of an extended stay hotel room is just pouring money and jobs into Arkansas!  It's going to take hundreds of new employees to service Room #406!  Arkansas will be a much more prosperous place because of Clean Line's temporary largesse!

So, if someone in Arkansas tells you that Clean Line Energy Partners is a fly-by-night company, be sure to tell them it's just not so.  They've rented a room at an extended stay hotel that they're using as a business office.  It won't be awkward at all to sell a right of way across your property to a company with office space at an extended stay hotel.  Instead, it shows their ongoing, long-term commitment to the people of Arkansas!
8 Comments

"Clean" Bravado

12/23/2016

4 Comments

 
The collapse of Clean Line Energy Partners has begun.  Although a long, screaming, fantastic flameout would tickle everyone's schadenfreude in a most delightful way, the death of Clean Line is more likely to look like this:
Now you see it, now you don't.  You simply wake up one morning and it's gone.  Snuck out of town in the middle of the night with its tail between its legs.

So, it looks like the company doesn't have enough "development" funds from its investors to continue running "full steam ahead" in Iowa.  The company was faced with filing very expensive exhibit material at the Iowa Utility Board, while its Illinois permit for the same project has been ordered void by a court.  It ended up being cheaper to withdraw its applications in Iowa.  If the company chooses to refile at a future date, it will  have to go through all the IUB requirements for a new application, such as landowner meetings in each county.  Although time consuming, and disastrous from a public relations standpoint, withdrawing was the cheaper of the two options in Iowa.

Cheaper.  Now all of a sudden Clean Line is concerned about costs?  Have they burned through $200M in "development funds" already?  Is the treasure chest getting a little low with no replenishment in sight?  Maybe that's because Clean Line has been using its "development" funds to pay for parts of its projects that should be financed.  Things like final engineering, environmental studies, purchase of rights of way, procurement of parts and labor, are all project costs, not development costs.  Development costs are the costs of obtaining a permit to build.  Once a permit is received, project costs begin.  Except Clean Line still has its cart before its horse and is funding project costs with development money.  Because it has no project financing.  Because it has no customers.

Wow!  How panicked are they in Houston right now?  Yesterday's press release on the Iowa withdrawal screams false bravado.
Despite the Rock Island Clean Line’s schedule delays, the need to build electric infrastructure remains. Clean Line Energy continues to move full steam ahead on its other transmission projects. Currently, hundreds of people are at work to complete engineering and design, test materials, and negotiate easements to prepare for groundbreaking on the Plains & Eastern Clean Line, the country’s largest clean energy infrastructure project. The Plains & Eastern Clean Line will connect low-cost, clean energy resources in the Oklahoma Panhandle to Arkansas and states throughout the Southeast.
No, Clean Line will NOT be breaking ground on Plains & Eastern any time soon.  Landowners in Arkansas and Oklahoma have refused to grant Clean Line right of way across their property.  Clean Line does NOT have eminent domain authority.  The most it can do is to run crying to the U.S. Department of Energy and ask that DOE begin condemnation proceedings against landowners who refuse.  And guess what?  The DOE has already written in stone that it will only begin condemnation proceedings against any landowners AFTER Clean Line reaches certain milestones with its project.  First and foremost, Clean Line must have customers for its transmission capacity.  Clean Line must have a contracted revenue stream sufficient to support financing to build its project.  Clean Line has no customers.  Therefore, Clean Line won't be breaking any ground until it has customers.

And on top of that, there is a lawsuit against DOE pending in federal court that claims DOE exceeded its statutory authority and trampled on the due process rights of Arkansas citizens.  DOE is unlikely to move forward with this project until the matter is settled.

Clean Line is going nowhere fast.  There is no "need" to build thousands of miles of "clean" lines.  No transmission planner has determined a "need" for these lines, and the lines have no customers.  No customers, no need!

No "clean" line!
4 Comments

Merry Christmas, Iowa!

12/22/2016

0 Comments

 
Looks like the Rock Island Clean Line finally admitted the futility of its game of permit wack-a-mole.

Today, the company withdrew its applications at the Iowa Utilities Board.

RICL says it wants to wait to see what happens at the Illinois Supreme Court before spending a bunch of money on its Iowa applications.

And maybe the investor cash is drying up and Clean Line's living large on investor funds is over.

Well, duh, Clean Line.  DUH!

Congratulations, Iowans!  Celebrate your victory!
0 Comments

Santa Stuffs FirstEnergy's Stocking Full of Serendipity

12/22/2016

0 Comments

 
After a year of telling investment wonks that it was planning to sell another one of its unprofitable coal-fired power plants to one of its regulated affiliates, while telling everyone else it didn't need any new generation capacity, FirstEnergy gifted itself with a big ol' sack of serendipity last Friday.

FirstEnergy's Mon Power subsidiary issued a Request for Proposals to acquire 1,300 MW of generation capacity, and 100 MW of demand respone.

Serendipity!  The Pleasants power station that FirstEnergy's competitive generation affiliate wants to "sell" to Mon Power is exactly 1,300 MW!  It's like some divine power has spoken!

I'm not sure whose gift that 100 MW of demand response is supposed to be, but maybe it was designed to placate someone?  Demand response is an aggregated group of power customers who agree to cut their usage during periods of high demand in exchange for payments.  So, why not 1,300 MW of demand response and 100 MW of generation?  Why not 100 MW of demand response and a 1,300 MW power purchase agreement from an economical regional generation source?  Why must we buy the cow, when the milk is available cheaply at the market?

Anyhow, Mon Power also limited its RFP to resources in a small geographic area.  Serendipity!  Pleasants is located in that geographic area!

And after talking about this "sale" and the issuance of an RFP for months, Mon Power issues its RFP on December 16 and allows one week for eligible resources to "pre-qualify" to submit a bid later?  Be sure to get your pack of pre-qualifying paperwork in by close of business on December 23, or you won't be able to bid later and there will be no Merry Christmas for you!  Bah!  Humbug!

Seriously?  They expect everyone to believe they didn't issue this RFP so close to the holidays, with a ridiculously short lead time, in order to limit any competition with the company's own resources?  I'm sure FirstEnergy's Allegheny Energy Supply Company has its paperwork all ready to be submitted... the rest of you?  Yeah, you need to start from scratch.  Right now.

So, why should you care?  Because the last coal-fired power station that FirstEnergy "sold" to Mon Power has cost you more than $130 so far.  Each.  You've gifted FirstEnergy more than $160M, but they still want more.

FirstEnergy is in big financial trouble, and they want you to bail them out of their bad business decisions.

And they arrogantly thumb their nose at customers, competitors, and regulators alike with their serendipitous RFP.  They must think this is a funny game, but uncompetitive RFPs can get companies in lots and lots of trouble.

What can you do in the mean time?  Why don't you ask Mon Power a question, such as why their RFP is so ridiculously unfair?  Or ask if Scrooge helped them with their response dates?

FirstEnergy doesn't even care how bad they look.  I guess they think they have this in the bag.  Stay tuned, pitckfork wielders...
0 Comments

Missouri Gives Grain Belt the Boot

12/14/2016

0 Comments

 
An impassioned public rejection of the Grain Belt Express project virtually saturated a packed Missouri Public Service Commission hearing Tuesday at the Cameron Community Center.
0 Comments

Clean Line's "Code of Conduct" Doesn't Protect Landowners

12/14/2016

0 Comments

 
Did you see Block Grain Belt Express- MO's facebook post yesterday?  It was a question/response from Clean Line regarding the company's "Code of Conduct."

As part of the hearing process at the PSC, Grain Belt Express must answer questions about its testimony submitted by other parties. Ever wonder what’s behind the smoke and mirrors you read in the newspapers? Here’s the response of Clean Line Vice President of Land, Deann Lanz to a question you may have wondered yourself over the years.
-------------------------
Who enforces Clean Line’s “Code of Conduct” for dealing with landowners, and does it protect you?

Question DL.2: With reference to page 4 line 11 of your testimony, please summarize all reported violations to date (if any) of the Code of Conduct by any employee or agent of Clean Line or Grain Belt in any of the states in which the proposed line will be located. Please include the name(s) of the individuals involved, the date of the occurrence, the location of the occurrence, and a brief summary of the conduct which violated the Code of Conduct.

Response: There have been two instances where Grain Belt Express investigated allegations of conduct outside the best practices standard. One involved a land agent visiting*************, a landowner in Chariton County, on June 12, 2014.
The other involved a phone call to *********, a landowner in Buchanan County, on April 2, 2014. In both instances the investigation found no violation of best practices. With Ms.********, the allegation was raised by a family member as opposed to Ms.******* herself. The meeting notes and report from the land agent showed no violation of the code of conduct or best practices. With Mr. ********, there was no record of the conversation taking place and Mr. ******** did not raise the issue with Grain Belt Express. The investigation showed no violation of the code of conduct or best practices.

In the first case family reported that a land agent refused to leave an elderly landowners room in a rest home. She repeatedly asked them to leave because she was ill. They refused. They told her that they would leave after she signed the easement. Family members told PSC staff about the incident and filled out a form that is now part of the public record.
In the second case, and elderly landowner was called and told "it was a done deal" and he needed to come fill out the papers. He believed them and had an appointment the next morning to sign the easement. He was told he was not allowed to bring anyone else with him. Luckily, he came to lock up after one of of our meetings and was shocked to find it was not a done deal! He submitted an affidavit about the issue to the PSC.
Block GBE representatives talked with the subject of one of these complaints last night, when he came out to the public hearing in Faucett.  Hear it direct from the horse's mouth:
Who do you believe?

When Clean Line enforces its own "Code" there are no "violations."  Because there really isn't any enforcement.

The "Code" seems more useful in the outhouse than in your house.
0 Comments

Cutting the Crap at DOE

12/11/2016

0 Comments

 
Have you heard about the DOE question list?  There's plenty of wing flapping in the media over the umbrage of the Trumpsters to question the inner workings of a bloated political agency like the U.S. Department of Energy.  You probably won't have to look far to find it.  It's been likened to a "witch hunt" because it ham-handedly asked for names of DOE employees.

Whatever.  I'm far more concerned about the majority of the questions that deal with the way in which DOE has funneled my tax money into dubious "clean energy" programs over the past 8 years, and what there is to show for it.  Insistence that the whole pack of questions be disregarded because some people don't like the way a few were phrased is political posturing of the worse kind.  It's ad hominem deflection for a bunch of questions the Obama administration's clean energy minions don't want to answer.  But, the clean energy party is over now.  Employees who strongly back their own climate change science probably won't want to work there anymore.  And for the few who want to continue their employment while insubordinately sabotaging the directives they receive from on high... well, shame on you!  You're probably setting yourself up for a righteous firing.

The DOE has been having a politically-biased fun fest with the taxpayers' money for the past 8 years and has bloated itself up to epic proportions.  It's been one payday after another for companies styling themselves as "renewable" so that they may be annointed king by the DOE in order to make a huge profit.  It's gotta end.  Stab the bloated beast!
So, here's one take on "the list" that attempts to comment on the questions.  Except this "expert" got the facts completely wrong on the sole question that I found interesting.

To add confusion to chaos, there appears to be two different copies of "the list" being circulated in the media.  While the questions are the same, their order, and assignment within DOE, appears differently.  The question below is #57 on one list, and #21 on the other.

It would help immensely if the authors of the list had managed to cite statutes correctly.  Is this what we get to look forward to for the next 4 years?
Can you provide a copy of any Participation Agreement under Section 1221 of EP Act signed by the Department?
The "expert" got his answer to this question wrong because not only does the question list the wrong statute, but the "expert's" quick research of this section of the Energy Policy Act only found PART of the referenced statute.
We’re way down in the weeds now. This section of the EP Act allows three or more contiguous states to establish a regional transmission siting agency. Not sure why they’ve asked this, but it does add to their knowledge of the projected vague transmission grid actions, which appears like it could be a big money drain.
Sec. 1221 of the Energy Policy Act (hint - search "1221" in this link, don't rely on third party excerpts of this section, they're not complete) provides the framework for the DOE to prepare triennial "studies" of transmission congestion and designate National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors, which would (on paper) give FERC backstop authority to site and permit transmission in these corridors.  (Except when challenged in court Sec. 1221 proved completely worthless -- doesn't work as DOE and FERC tried to interpret it.)  It also provides for that "interstate compact" thing that no state wants to get involved in.

Neither one of these statutory responsibilities require DOE to sign a "Participation Agreement."  DOE has statutory authority to study and designate corridors.  FERC has backstop siting authority if a state fails to act.  States have statutory authority to enter into compacts.  DOE does not "participate" in compacts, nor siting and permitting transmission projects in NIET corridors.

But, DOE *does* have authority to enter into agreements with third party transmission developers under Section 1222 of the EP Act, Third-Party Financing.  In a nutshell, Sec. 1222 allows the DOE to "participate" in transmission projects owned and financed by third parties.  DOE would need a "Participation Agreement" to participate in a project under this section of the statute.

And DOE announced just such a participation earlier this year, and signed a Participation Agreement.  Said "Participation Agreement" stinks like collusion.  Affected landowner groups in Arkansas have filed a complaint in federal court alleging that DOE overstepped its statutory authority.

Ya think that's perhaps where that question was intended to go?  Proofreading saves lives!  Let's hope the typo gets corrected.

And there's another question on that list I find really interesting.
What is the goal of the grid modernization effort? Is there some terminal point to this effort? Is its genesis statutory or something else?
Assuming that there are no typos in that question, what is DOE's "grid modernization effort"?  Where does the millions this program hands out for R&D come from?  And what statute authorized DOE to set up this program and use it to justify all this spending?

How does the work of this "initiative" dovetail with the work done by regional transmission organizations that plan and operate the electric grid and electric markets?  How much of what DOE's initiative does is simply hypothetical repetition of the work the RTOs already do?  Electric consumers fund RTOs, and then they're hit again in their taxes to fund DOE's repetitive planning and studies.  And then there's even conflicting programs within DOE.  How does its "Grid Wind Integration" program align with its "participation" in supposedly "wind integrating" transmission projects under Sec. 1222?  Has DOE's "participation" in a 1222 project been vetted under the department's own grid wind integration standards?

Who's in charge of electric transmission in this country?  States have authority over siting and permitting of new transmission.  FERC has jurisdiction over interstate transmission rates.  RTOs have responsibility granted through FERC to plan and operate the regional grids.  What statutory role does DOE have regarding transmission?  Pretty much none.  DOE is the political house of federal energy concerns.  What it does is politically motivated.  Political fortunes at DOE can change every 4 years.  Sometimes the change isn't very noticeable.  This time it will be.  But not just because the incoming administration has radically different ideas.  Part of what makes this change so extreme is the bloated nature of today's DOE, fueled by political actions taken outside of Congressional purview over the past eight years.

We need to slim down this disgusting bloat and statutorily define who is doing what in Washington.  Allowing a little sunshine into DOE's actions under Sec. 1222 of the EP Act is a good start.
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Valley Link Transmission
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.